Thursday, February 17, 2011

Why Great Players Make "Turrible" Analyst


One of the most ironic aspects of basketball is the fact that great players almost never make good analyst. When they were players they could do almost anything they wanted on the court but as analyst they can barely put together complete thoughts. Growing up listening to the likes of Mark Jackson, Isiah Thomas, Magic Johnson, and Jalen Rose (who was far from great but is a nominee for worst NBA analyst) I always wondered how these guys were ever good at the game of basketball. They never seemed like they had anything intelligent to say about the game and were constantly put on the spot because most barely spoke at all. The person who goes in most depth about this issue is Bill Simmons in The Book of Basketball. Nonetheless my belief on why great/good players always end up being terrible analyst is because they never really watched the game; they were always playing, they didn't have to work as hard as others, and never had to articulate or find the reasoning of their playing style.


Most professional basketball players can tell you who their favorite player was growing up as a child, and he might even be able to give you some stats about that one player. However, ask him some historical facts about the franchise he is playing for and 9.9 times out of 1o he will not know the answer to the question. In 2010, while being interviewed by the TNT cast of Ernie Johnson, Kenny Smith, and Charles Barkely, Aaron Brooks, the point guard of the Rockets, was asked who was the starting pg of the championship Rocket teams was in the 90s. Aaron replied with a smile on his face "That was Sam Cassell." Wrong, that was Kenny Smith, one of the guys interview Brooks. TNT showed a close up of The Jet and he had a "are you serious" look on his face. If you're really good at basketball you have to, of course, practice it, but doesn't also make sense that you would actually have to watch how the game is played? Apparently not. This seems evident when you have analyst such as Isaiah Thomas. Thomas was one of the analysts covering Game 6 of 1998 NBA final between the Jazz and the Bulls. This is one of the most historic games in the history of basketball, and yet the only times Isaiah spoke is when Collins asked him a direct question. And even then Thomas would sometimes give short responses. It was like he never saw a game before, but he had played in games just as important. For once Isaiah wasn't playing in a big game he was watching it and he was completely mesmerized.

All great players are known for one aspect of their game that separated them for the rest. Magic's passing, Bird's shooting, Michael's everything (I know I said one but I can't help it) but we never really appreciate the athletic prowess, size, and strength that these super athletes posses. Most are over 6'2" and are about 200 lbs; gigantic men that move like gazelles. These men were always one of the best players in their respective levels of play, and the great ones were simply the best at their positions. Why would they have to truly learn the game if they were always faster, stronger, quicker, and simply more athletic than everybody else? They don't and they didn't. Mark Jackson who is 3rd all time in assist in NBA history, is now an ESPN analyst once in a game, after an offensive rim interference was called, stated that the basketball still counts. Umm no, it actually doesn't Mark. This isn't a new rule folks and he played 17 seasons in the league! Another example is Charles Barkley. Arguably the 3rd great power forward ever, he is now famous for saying ridiculous statements about the game every Thursday night during the NBA season on TNT. What went wrong?

Nothing went wrong, they just never had to explain their game or why they did certain things against certain defenses, they just did it. It's that simple; if I do A B will happen. My favorite example of this is Magic Johnson. While ever speaking of the Show Time Lakers of the 1980s you got more "ooooos" and "uhhhhs" then actually words. This also true when he covered games. Magic never said "I looked to the left to throw off the defender and passed the ball to the right because I saw Byron Scott trailing the play after he grabbed the rebound." Nope, instead he'd simply say "looking left and throwing right." Thanks Magic that explains a lot. These men never had to think things through because their whole lives they had been doing the same thing, dominating and winning basketball games.

Great players make terrible analyst because they never truly watched the games, never had to work as hard, and never needed to find the reasoning behind their games they just played. It's just not meant to be. Great players are meant to be spoke about not to speak. They spent so much time perfecting their games they never made the time to realize they were more effective against certain player/defenses they just knew whatever they were doing worked. It is up to guys and gals like us who never made it past high school ball to break down every aspect of the game because we spend our time on the side line living vicariously through the greats. No matter how odd it may seem it is simply the truth, but I'm not mad at them. They make every winter and spring worth wild and give guys like me something to write about every week.

Monday, February 7, 2011

The Tragic Hero


There isn't anything I could say that has not already been said by any ESPN journalist about Lebron James, but as a die heart basketball fan I have to share my feelings on the events that took place this summer. First, let me tell you my story of "The Decision." The week leading up to that infamous hour I inquired, amongst my friends, to figure out where people thought he would end up. Most people I asked thought he was going to New York. However, my brain trust of basketball thought differently. Paul, Brian (http://2up3down.blogspot.com), and Caleb all had faith and believed he would stay in Cleveland. Me, I knew that LBJ was not chasing money (so NY was out), knew he was tired of losing big games (so Cleveland was out), and thought he was too competitive to play with his buddies (so Miami was out). I thought he was the ideal superstar, had all the gifts to dominate but had the sense of mind to keep his teammates involved. I thought he was the combination of physical prowess and competitiveness that we have not seen since MJ. I thought he was going to Chicago, but I was wrong. I believed that Lebron wanted to win, but also wanted to carry a team to the promise land. I just knew he was going to show all the Kobe fans ( or satanist, your choice ) that he could beat the Lakers with some real talent but still be the unquestionable alpha dog of his team. I was riding false hope into the waking minutes of "The Decision" like a wife waiting on her husband that has been working late for three straight weeks. LBJ was the shinning knight, he was the guy who was going to slay Kobe's reign of terror on the league, I was sure of it! And then he spoke the ugliest words an athlete has ever spoken, "I'm going to take my talents to South Beach and join the Miami Heat." Disgusting! I felt worst than Chazz Palminteri at the end of Usual Suspects. For the first time I saw Lebron for what he really was; a weak, self-centered, spoiled super athlete. And thus I deemed him Lebitch.
The first thing that came to mind after "The Betrayal" was that no one could compare Lebitch to Jordan anymore. Michael was a transcendent athlete that played for a Bulls team that was terrible when he was drafted in '84, but made it his mission to carry Chicago to the promise land and become the best player he could be along the way. Michael loved winning. He wanted to win at everything he did at life. (and in most cases he did) In Lebitch's case, however, no one can really pinpoint what his reason is for playing the game we love. Money? Fame? Highlight on ESPN top 10? No one can say for certain. So instead of pondering a question no one can answer I will answer one that has a definitive answer. Question: Why can't Lebitch be like MJ? Answer: Lebitch will never be MJ because he lacks the drive, competitiveness and focus that Jordan fed off when he played.

The first and smallest difference between Lebitch and Jordan is drive. Now, I am not claiming that LBJ is not a driven player. We have all witnessed his explosions against Deshawn Stevenson, the Hawks, and most recently his decapitation of the Magic while keeping in mind that Orlando's GM, Otis Smith, questioned his competitiveness in the summer. What I am claiming is that his drive comes and goes, and that it seems that he only is driven by outside forces instead of being self-driven. Bill Russell would give himself a grade after every game, the scale being from 1 to 100. The greatest winner in NBA history never gave himself a grade over 50. When Jordan was lacking motivation he would convince himself that someone disrespected him or his game, and torched them for acts they never committed. For example, before a playoff game against the Heat, Jordan walked into the arena and greeted the players he saw as he made his way to the locker room. However, according to Jordan, Alonzo Mourning didn't shake Michael's hand. Jordan was so pissed that he made it his mission to single handedly destroy Alonzo and the Heat. Yet, when Alonzo was asked about the alleged cold shoulder, Mourning said it never happened. He even claimed that he didn't see Jordan until the warm ups began. My problem with Lebitch is that he is only driven when other people can see it, not by nature. Michael did whatever it took to win, even if that meant making up stories to keep himself driven. And lastly, if you think of basketball in the '90s you think of one man, Michael Jordan. He is first and everyone else comes second. This is not the case for Lebitch. He could be the best player in damn near any sport if he chose to but he doesn't, there will always be the debate over who was better Kobe or Lebitch.

The next point and reason I now hate LBJ is his displaced sense of competitiveness. For some odd reason Lebitch cannot comprehend how playing with the third best player (while he is the second best) in the league stains the public's perception of his competitiveness. Some of the best games of the past two or three years have been Wade James duels. Being able to watch two truly great athletes go shot for shot is like watching two great heavy weights go blow for blow. No one can genuinely articulate what your eyes are beholding, you just had to see it to comprehend it. Imagine if Joe Frazier refused to fight Muhammad Ali? Imagine instead that they became training partners and sat at each other's corner during fights are rooted each other on? (Did you throw up yet? Yeah, me too) How could these too super athletes, James and Wade, even want to play with one another? They are suppose to size themselves up against each other. They're suppose to read the papers just to see each others stats so they know what they have to beat out their next game. Lebitch should want to destroy Wade just to show the rest of the world how much better he is, but instead he CHOSE to play with with Wade. In an interview, while promoting the video game NBA 2K11, Jordan said "I would've never called up Larry and Magic and ask them to play with me." Yes Mike, we know you wouldn't. We know Jordan lived for the moments where he could out assists Magic and out shoot Bird, he lived for the moments where he showed the world that he was basketball. LBJ is suppose to follow this example, but instead he take the easy way out. Now just imagine Bird, Magic, and Jordan together in their primes. (Wait... let it all sink in) Would that even be fun to watch? Maybe at first, but after their 5th championship would there even be a need for a regular season or even the playoffs for that matter? Why wouldn't the league just pick a team name out the hat and whoever got picked had the "pleasure" of losing a championship series to Bird, Magic, and Jordan. "And the lucky loser is.... Houston! Get out there fellas, don't lose by too much! " The point of sports is to compete, the reason for professional sports is to have all of our best athletes compete against each other to see who is better and who is the best. The Miami Heat fiasco completely undermines the entire reason for sports, if there are two best players on one team then how can you tell who is better? As a competitor you should want to win, but you should want to beat all of your competition along the way. Michael lived by this, Lebitch ran from it.

Finally and most importantly, the biggest factor that will always separate Jordan from James is focus. No one mentions focus when they speak about Jordan's greatness. I myself got the idea from a book named How to Be Like Mike, by Pat Williams. In the first chapter of the book he tells of an instance in which gave him a new perspective on Michael. While working for the Orlando Magic he asked, former Jordan teammate, B.J. Armstrong to take a look at the beginnings of his book. Armstrong told Pat that he "missed the most important thing." "The thing that makes Micheal who he is", B.J. said, "is his focus." People don't usual tend to see focus as a characteristic of greatness, but when you take some time to ponder the thought, it makes sense. You can credit his prowess on the court to his athleticism or work ethic, but what happened when he was sick or injured? Those last two things are negated, yet somehow Jordan found a way to excel. The most famous of these games was in Game 5 of the 1995 NBA Finals. Michael was terrible ill, reports stating he had "flu like" symptoms (whatever that means). Despite the vague and questionable diagnosis, it was obvious that MJ was not himself. Moving slowly in warm ups and was sweating puddles, everyone knew something was wrong with Michael. However, Jordan was a winner and although his body gave in his was too focused to lose. He finished the game with 38 points, hit the game winning shot, and was carried off the floor by Pip' like a groom carrying his new bride to bed for the first time. However, this is not the only instance of Michael's focus. In 1988, Jordan acquired a cold before the all-star game, but instead of sitting out he scored 42 points and a win. MJ was entirely focused on winning, and nothing would stop him for doing so. James' focus, on the other hand, is else where. As I stated earlier, I can't say in complete confidence that Lebitch is focused on winning. Especially after the 2010 playoffs against the Boston Celtics. As the series' momentum swung toward Boston LBJ gave up, he stop running back on defense and seemed disinterested on the offense. He claimed that whole season that the summer was not distracting him, but it seemed clear that he couldn't wait to get out of a Cavs uniform. The usual amazement I experience when watching James was not there. I never thought "Okay Lebron is about to turn it on now" because I wasn't getting that feeling of anticipation anymore. Can anyone ever say this about Jordan? After "The Decision" happened he stated that he was keeping "metal notes" of critics and made the most pitiful commercial I ever saw. (What should you do Lebitch? Focus on winning instead of critics!) LBJ is that guy in high school who couldn't stand the fact that he might not win prom king, and did everything to get every single vote. Let me fill you in on a secret Lebitch, everyone loves and/or respects champions so why don't you focus on winning one of them?

In final analysis, the reason LBJ lacks the drive, competitiveness, and the focus to be like or greater than Mike is a result of his tragic flaw, his ego. James needs to be loved, needs to be seen as amazing, and can only take praise and never criticism. Instead of taking the challenge of carrying a team to a championship, he took the easy way out and chose to play in Miami with Wade and Bosh. LBJ was suppose to save us from the all the arrogant infuriating superstars of today and he ended up being the greatest ass of them all. He has all the physical talents to be the greatest player we have ever seen, but it is his mental flaws that will always keep him out the same breath as Magic, Bird, and Jordan. We will always remember Lebron James as the coward who could of been our savior.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Flagrant Foul

Hello sports fans, get ready for an in depth look on basketball from today and the past. The first post will be 02/11/11