Tuesday, June 21, 2011

My Thoughts on the Looming NBA Lockout and it’s comparison to the NFL Lockout


Unfortunately, for us sports fans, two of America’s major sports are in or seemingly about to be in a lockout. Now two buzzillion days into the NFL lock out it is hard to even remember the excitement and joy football brings to us. However, the NBA season has just finished, and boy did it go out with a bang! The Dallas Mavericks defeat the Miami Chockers (uhmm) I meant Heat in six games, and basketball lovers everywhere are basking in Lecoward’s defeat. Thus this raises the question, After one of the greatest and most profitable NBA seasons ever how could there be a lock out? The answer is simple my friends, the NBA actually lost money last season! To give you a better perspective, NBA owners lost about $300 million dollars during the course of the 2010-2011 season. This is obviously a trend that cannot occur often. Although my two favorite sports are among lockouts my perspective on the two are very different. When it comes to the NFL’s position I am pro player. Here are my three main reasons for this:

1. Football players, essentially, get injured for a living. I am not stating that football is a tougher or manlier sport than the others, but let’s be honest those guys can get seriously hurt every play. They earn the money they make and more importantly they are not over-paid.

2. In contrast to the NBA, the NFL has refused to show us their books and reveal the issues concerning revenue in which they claim to have. Football is the most popular sport in the country; do these owners truly expect me to believe they have money issues? (Which is the perfect segue to)

3. The NFL owners are simply greedy. Aside from hiding the books, owners’ old, white, wrinkly mugs have become a stable of the game (which is not a good thing). Much to my delight, the Cowboys were terrible this season yet I still saw Jerry Jones entirely too much. They are selfish, egotistical, prima donnas[i] that put themselves ahead their franchise’s and football’s future.

The NBA’s situation is completely different; I am pro- NBA owner for mainly these three reasons[ii].

1. Some NBA players make way too much money. Guys like Devin Harris, T.J. Ford, and Michael Redd are just a few of players who made millions of dollars and either played poorly, or didn’t play at all! Even some “franchise guys” like Joe Johnson, who just received a $120 million contract, didn’t have anything close to a MVP like season. Something has to be done so that occurrences such as these cannot happen.

2. Players, like LeChoke… I meant LeBron James, should not have as much power in free agency as they do. Being able to hold a team and a city of fans hostage should not be a privilege of any player.

3. There has to be a plan to make the playing field fair for small market teams. It’s not the Bobcats fault that they are in Charlotte instead of L.A.; thus they should not be punished for that by not being able to compete for top free agents.

When it comes the comparing the NFL and NBA lockout the similarities begin and end at the fact of a lockout, because they seem to be polar opposites. There is a lot that has to be settled in the next few weeks if a NBA lockout is to be eluded. All we can do as fans is hope that NBA players are not as greedy as NFL owners[iii]. And the NBA nips these issues at the bub so that they will never resurface again.


[i] I know those words mean the same thing, but I am trying to make a point here!!!

[ii] The reason that didn’t make the list was the fact that I plainly dislike NBA players today. Most share the self-centered characteristic that the NFL owners have.

[iii] Just to give you an idea on the player’s stance: Derek Fisher, the Head of the NBA Players Association, decided to miss the first meeting and go on vacation. Yet another reason to hate a Laker.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Top Five Point Guards Ever


Today I embark on my mission to rank the top five players at every position in the game of basketball starting from the Point guards and ending with the Centers. I got one of my buddies, Brian aka 2up3down.blogspot.com/thebriantrust.tumblr.com, to do these rankings with me. Make sure you check out his list after mine.


Before I listed the players and gave my reasons for my list I felt it was important to give each player a grade so that readers would have a bit of an idea of what the players’ strengths and weakness were. However, I decided that each player is too diverse and complicated to give one grade so I thought it would be best to grade each part of their game. Thus, I created a grading system that consisted of 5 categories; each category would receive a letter grade. The categories are offense ability (O), one on one defender (D), Teamwork (TW), winning (W), and character (C). When I was explaining this grading system to my friend Paul he seemed skeptical about “character” being a category for two reasons. One, he did not know if a fan could know enough about a player’s personality without really knowing the player personally. Two, he did not know how much that mattered. Great points! Counterarguments: First, I have done extensive research and studied on the game of basketball and the players who have played it for the entirety of my life. As a result, I do not know anyone personally who knows more about the game than me. I have read every basketball book and watched every basketball tape I could get my hands on since I was nine. So let’s be honest folks, would I really be writing all of this unless I really cared about people forming correct opinions about basketball’s greatest players? In other words, you are going to have to trust me![i] Secondly, we all have heard a high school coach say that famous cliché (usually when his team is fed up with the school’s superstar basketball player), “You don’t gotta like the guy, you just gotta play with him!![ii]” See, the thing about clichés is that they are almost never true. Kind of like my favorite cliché, “You can do anything if you set your mind to it.” It sounds right; you want it to be right, but in reality it does not work that way. My entire life I have wanted to play in the NBA. For about eight years I set my mind to it, and then I turned seventeen. I was 5”10’ (and still am to this day), 135-140 lbs (I’m about 150 lbs now), and might have had a 22 inch vertical leap at my apex (don’t ask)[iii]. In short it was not going to happen; my brain simply was not “athletic” enough to carry me to the NBA. Likewise, players that cannot find common ground cannot win and if they do it will not last long. This is proven by Ricky Barry and the warriors, also by Wilt and every single team he played on! Shaq and Kobe gave up 2 or 3 guaranteed titles just so they did not have to play with one another[iv]. In theory you do not have to like your teammates, but in reality, unequivocally, you do. Now, time to get to the business end of this article. I will to try my best not to be biased and give fair rankings[v], promise. Here we go!

5. John Stockton: (Back-to-back Finals appearances & All-Time leader in assists)

O D TW W C

A C A+ B+ A-


4. Bob Cousy: (1957 NBA MVP & 6 rings)

O D TW W C

A B A+ A+ A

The fifth and fourth point guards on my list are a bit more similar than people seem to believe. Both guards were small in stature (6”2’ give or take an inch), both had a good shot (with an edge to Stockton), both were great passer(s), both were clutch and quiet leaders. Also, both players played second fiddle to hall of fame big men, who were the true alpha of their teams. Not to mention their career averages weren’t that far off as well (Stockton’s career stats: 13.1 pts and 10.5 ast) (Cousy’s stat line: 18.4 pts and 7.5 ast). Their differences are few. Stockton was a pass first point, because he had Karl Malone to do most of the team’s scoring. Cousy was more of a shoot first guard because his best teammate, Bill Russel, was more of a defensive minded player. Stockton was a far more efficient scorer (52% FG) than Cousy (38% FG), but that is because Cousy took more shots. Cousy is seen as a better defender but that is because he never had to guard the likes of Isaiah Thomas, Tim Hardaway, Kevin Johnson and all the other super athletic point guards that torched Stockton. So are you asking yourself how did I come to the conclusion to pick Cousy over Stockton, yet? There are two reasons. The first being Cousy’s innovation at the point guard position. Cousy created the template that most points have and will follow from now on. He was firs to use his ball handling skills to create offense for his team[vi] and threw difficult “unsafe[vii]” passes that no one else attempted. The second, and most important, is winning. Although Stockton was helped carry a Jazz team to two back-to-back title appearances in the late ‘90s, they fell short both times. Bob Cousy won six titles in his time with the Celtics, and in the end that was the only stat that ever really mattered.

3. Isaiah Thomas: (‘90s Finals MVP & 2 rings)

O D TW W C

A B+ A+ A+ A

The original bad boy was simply one of the best. He averaged just about 20 points and 9 assists for his career (regular season and playoffs). He was the leader of one of the toughest, most physical, and most intimidating teams that the NBA has ever seen[viii]. Zeke won two back-to-back titles with the Piston (’89 and ’90[ix]) and was the 1990 Finals MVP. He was a good defender and excellent scorer but also a skilled willing passer. He led his Pistons team into war every game and his teammates loved him for it[x]. However what I feel is most impressive of Isaiah was his understanding of the game as a player. In The Book of Basketball, Bill Simmons writes of a time where Isaiah explained to him “the secret of basketball.” Zeke told Simmons that basketball really isn’t about the game itself but about five men working together to accomplish a similar goal. Truly beautiful, don’t you think? But now are you questioning why Zeke isn’t higher on my list? The reason stems from his one flaw that really isn’t a flaw at all. Isaiah was not a transcendent player. In fact, when I first sat down to come up with this list I completely forgot about Isaiah altogether! To be fair part of the reason I forgot him was I wasn’t born when he was in his prime, but I did think of Bob Cousy and no one reading this article was born in his prime! He was a great player, no one can argue that, but what you can argue is that he was simply a more athletic combination of the fourth and fifth point guard of this list. He was score first point (like Cousy) that made all the right passes at the right times (like Stockton). Although it may seem like I am down playing his game, it’s the truth. Also, his time in NBA front offices (mostly all train wrecks) have hurt his legacy unfairly[xi]. But still to be third on this list is saying a lot, and I am sure Isaiah knows that as well.

2. Oscar Robertson: (Only player to average triple double, 1964 NBA MVP & one ring)

O D TW W C

A+ B+ B A C+

The Big O was light-years ahead of his time. He was a 6’5” 220 pound point guard at a time when that was the greater than some of the power forwards in the league. Oscar was the first true stat stuffer; he was good at just about everything[xii]. Oscar is most known for his years in Cincinnati when he won the 1964 NBA MVP and averaged a triple double (30.8 pts, 11.4 ast, 12.5 reb, FG 49%, FT 80 %) in the 1961-62 season. (Nasty!) For his career he averaged 25.7 points, 9.5 assists, 7.5 rebounds. He led forgettable Royals teams to conference and NBA finals and eventually won his only ring with Milwaukee. In his prime, Oscar was too big, too strong, and too athletic for opposing point guards to handle. Although that may seem like a crowning achieve for most resumes, it actually serves as the best agreement to make Oscar second on this list instead of first. Yes, Oscar was too big, strong, and athletic for his opposition but that has just as much to do with the league as it did him. In the 1960s, for the most part, was still a smaller man’s league and was played below the rim. Today 6’4” 6’5” are average height for point guards. Back then, he was straight out of a folk tale. In other words, he sort of had an unfair advantage on the competition. If you dropped Oscar in the 80s, 90s, or today he would not have come close to the numbers he did in the 1960s. Another argument against Oscar is that he could not be the best player on his team to win a championship. Despite being a man amongst boys, he only won one ring and that was with a young Kareem Abdul-Jabar leading the way. Although I did state earlier that his supporting cast was never worth remembering, he still led them into the spring. And he might have one a ring in Cincinnati if it were not for his fatal flaw and the biggest difference between him and the guy ahead of him on this list. Oscar’s fatal flaw was his bitterness. Oscar was a great black athlete during a time when African Americans were not treated as equals. After Oscar had reached his breaking point, he escaped (mentally and emotionally) to a lonely place and never came back out. He played the game to win, and took out anyone who got in his way (including teammates). If Oscar might have been a bit more supportive or encouraging instead of forceful and demanding his teammates may have played a little harder for him. Maybe they want to see him win instead of take cheer in his/their defeat. Maybe they love him instead of despising him. I can’t say for sure, but for what it’s worth Oscar was great he just wasn’t the best.

1: Magic Johnson: (3 time NBA MVP, 3 time Finals MVP & 5 rings)

O D TW W C

A C+ A+ A+ A+

Magic Johnson was, in one word, magical. At 6’9” he towered over opposing point guards and was quicker than every forward in the league, no one could guard him. He commanded the game with such precision. He averaged 19.5 points, 11.2 assists, and 7.3 rebounds for his career. He could run a half court offense to perfection and ran the fast break better than everyone before and after. He was the key component in the creation of the “Showtime” Lakers in the 1980s. He took the no-look pass from an occasional sight and made it into his deadliest weapon. I mean, how do you defend a pass without having an idea of which way it’s going? You can’t, and that’s what made him so good. The only part about his game that over-shadowed his command of the offense was his versatility. Magic could rebound, pass, and score with the best of them. He also had the size and strength to play any position his team needed him too[xiii]. The two flaws in Magic’s game were his inconsistent jump shot and his one on one defense. However, he made up for his flaws with his valiant leadership and infectious charisma. Everyone loved Magic, partly for his charm but also for his unmistakable love for playing and winning. (He even made a stiff like Kareem fall in love with basketball and winning again). Basketball fans finally had a star that was easy to connect to. However, it may have been that charm that may have lead to his downfall[xiv]. Magic’s career was cut short due to his acquisition of HIV in 1991.[xv]. Nevertheless, he left basketball fans with great memories and hurtful defeats (Celtic fans). He forever changed the point guard position and the fast break offense. He (along with Bird) made America fall back in love with basketball, and is true ambassador for the game. Yet, the most amazing part of Magic is that he is an even greater man than he was a player. And we will always love him for that.

There’s my list; I know I will reassure some and infuriate others. Agree with it, critique it, but please comment on it! Honorable mentions: Gary Payton, Jason kidd, Steve nash, Mark Jackson, Denis Johnson, nate archibald, Tim Hardaway, and of course, Allen Iverson[xvi].




[i] I care damn it!

[ii] In my case we had two guys that weren’t always easy to like, Jared D. and Ramon G. Ramon ended up getting kicked off the team, moved to Florida, get his act together and plays Divison one basketball at South Carolina University. Jared (who the coaches choose to keep over Ramon) was 19 in the tenth grade with a son, and wasn’t eligible after his second year at my high school because of his age. He was supposed to get his GED and play for Texas A&M the following fall. It seemed like all was going to go well for him too; until the following fall, on my way home from school, I saw him on the subway. Well at least one made it, I guess.

[iii] Although I wasn’t the greatest leaper, I was extremely fast. I was supposed to run track and field; I would’ve been great at it. The only problem is I hate running just to run. When I did show up at the track I ran well because I can’t stand losing. However, doing that every day? It just wasn’t for me.

[iv] This was also true for my high school team. After Monnie was kicked off the team we were still able to reach the Philly high school final four and state championship tournament in ’07 and ’08. However both times we fell short of a championship because he didn’t have enough team chemistry.

[v] I am a Philly Guy and I love my city and our athletes’ waaay too much. Still, I am an even greater basketball fan than a Philadelphia fan, I think.

[vi] Up to that point the NBA was a boring “pass the ball a buzzillion times before someone takes a shot” league.

[vii] I put unsafe in quotations because the passes that were deemed unsafe and foolish in the ‘50s and ‘60s are passes that youngsters are learning to use today. Behind the back, no look, jumping in the air passes were all new then but fairly standard now

[viii] His ’89 Piston team was one of the greatest ever. They dethroned a Magic Lakers team and stop Jordan on the way to the Finals.

[ix] It probably would’ve been three if Isaiah wouldn’t have hurt his ankle in the ’88 Finals against the Lakers.

[x] Ironically Isaiah burned every bridge he had with guys who weren’t his teammates. Two most famous: Losing a Magic as a best-friend for questioning Magic’s sexuality, and Jordan hating him so much he forced Chuck Daily (Isaiah’s Piston coach) to keep Thomas off the Dream Team!

[xi] After his playing days, Zeke ruined the CBA and destroyed countless NBA rosters. His most famous incident was setting the Knicks back for about four years. Kind of makes you question how he could have ever been a great player. I like to call this the Mark Jackson syndrome.

[xii] His only skill flaw being an consistent long range jumper.

[xiii] In Game 6 of the 1980 Finals, Kareem was out with an injury; Magic started at center (and was recorded to have played ever other position as well). Magic finished the game with 42 pts, 15 reb, and 7 ast.

[xiv] And by this I mean getting to little toooo lucky with the ladies.

[xv] He made a short comeback in 1996 but only played a few months before retiring again.

[xvi] So what I’m biased? Sue me!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Why Great Players Make "Turrible" Analyst


One of the most ironic aspects of basketball is the fact that great players almost never make good analyst. When they were players they could do almost anything they wanted on the court but as analyst they can barely put together complete thoughts. Growing up listening to the likes of Mark Jackson, Isiah Thomas, Magic Johnson, and Jalen Rose (who was far from great but is a nominee for worst NBA analyst) I always wondered how these guys were ever good at the game of basketball. They never seemed like they had anything intelligent to say about the game and were constantly put on the spot because most barely spoke at all. The person who goes in most depth about this issue is Bill Simmons in The Book of Basketball. Nonetheless my belief on why great/good players always end up being terrible analyst is because they never really watched the game; they were always playing, they didn't have to work as hard as others, and never had to articulate or find the reasoning of their playing style.


Most professional basketball players can tell you who their favorite player was growing up as a child, and he might even be able to give you some stats about that one player. However, ask him some historical facts about the franchise he is playing for and 9.9 times out of 1o he will not know the answer to the question. In 2010, while being interviewed by the TNT cast of Ernie Johnson, Kenny Smith, and Charles Barkely, Aaron Brooks, the point guard of the Rockets, was asked who was the starting pg of the championship Rocket teams was in the 90s. Aaron replied with a smile on his face "That was Sam Cassell." Wrong, that was Kenny Smith, one of the guys interview Brooks. TNT showed a close up of The Jet and he had a "are you serious" look on his face. If you're really good at basketball you have to, of course, practice it, but doesn't also make sense that you would actually have to watch how the game is played? Apparently not. This seems evident when you have analyst such as Isaiah Thomas. Thomas was one of the analysts covering Game 6 of 1998 NBA final between the Jazz and the Bulls. This is one of the most historic games in the history of basketball, and yet the only times Isaiah spoke is when Collins asked him a direct question. And even then Thomas would sometimes give short responses. It was like he never saw a game before, but he had played in games just as important. For once Isaiah wasn't playing in a big game he was watching it and he was completely mesmerized.

All great players are known for one aspect of their game that separated them for the rest. Magic's passing, Bird's shooting, Michael's everything (I know I said one but I can't help it) but we never really appreciate the athletic prowess, size, and strength that these super athletes posses. Most are over 6'2" and are about 200 lbs; gigantic men that move like gazelles. These men were always one of the best players in their respective levels of play, and the great ones were simply the best at their positions. Why would they have to truly learn the game if they were always faster, stronger, quicker, and simply more athletic than everybody else? They don't and they didn't. Mark Jackson who is 3rd all time in assist in NBA history, is now an ESPN analyst once in a game, after an offensive rim interference was called, stated that the basketball still counts. Umm no, it actually doesn't Mark. This isn't a new rule folks and he played 17 seasons in the league! Another example is Charles Barkley. Arguably the 3rd great power forward ever, he is now famous for saying ridiculous statements about the game every Thursday night during the NBA season on TNT. What went wrong?

Nothing went wrong, they just never had to explain their game or why they did certain things against certain defenses, they just did it. It's that simple; if I do A B will happen. My favorite example of this is Magic Johnson. While ever speaking of the Show Time Lakers of the 1980s you got more "ooooos" and "uhhhhs" then actually words. This also true when he covered games. Magic never said "I looked to the left to throw off the defender and passed the ball to the right because I saw Byron Scott trailing the play after he grabbed the rebound." Nope, instead he'd simply say "looking left and throwing right." Thanks Magic that explains a lot. These men never had to think things through because their whole lives they had been doing the same thing, dominating and winning basketball games.

Great players make terrible analyst because they never truly watched the games, never had to work as hard, and never needed to find the reasoning behind their games they just played. It's just not meant to be. Great players are meant to be spoke about not to speak. They spent so much time perfecting their games they never made the time to realize they were more effective against certain player/defenses they just knew whatever they were doing worked. It is up to guys and gals like us who never made it past high school ball to break down every aspect of the game because we spend our time on the side line living vicariously through the greats. No matter how odd it may seem it is simply the truth, but I'm not mad at them. They make every winter and spring worth wild and give guys like me something to write about every week.

Monday, February 7, 2011

The Tragic Hero


There isn't anything I could say that has not already been said by any ESPN journalist about Lebron James, but as a die heart basketball fan I have to share my feelings on the events that took place this summer. First, let me tell you my story of "The Decision." The week leading up to that infamous hour I inquired, amongst my friends, to figure out where people thought he would end up. Most people I asked thought he was going to New York. However, my brain trust of basketball thought differently. Paul, Brian (http://2up3down.blogspot.com), and Caleb all had faith and believed he would stay in Cleveland. Me, I knew that LBJ was not chasing money (so NY was out), knew he was tired of losing big games (so Cleveland was out), and thought he was too competitive to play with his buddies (so Miami was out). I thought he was the ideal superstar, had all the gifts to dominate but had the sense of mind to keep his teammates involved. I thought he was the combination of physical prowess and competitiveness that we have not seen since MJ. I thought he was going to Chicago, but I was wrong. I believed that Lebron wanted to win, but also wanted to carry a team to the promise land. I just knew he was going to show all the Kobe fans ( or satanist, your choice ) that he could beat the Lakers with some real talent but still be the unquestionable alpha dog of his team. I was riding false hope into the waking minutes of "The Decision" like a wife waiting on her husband that has been working late for three straight weeks. LBJ was the shinning knight, he was the guy who was going to slay Kobe's reign of terror on the league, I was sure of it! And then he spoke the ugliest words an athlete has ever spoken, "I'm going to take my talents to South Beach and join the Miami Heat." Disgusting! I felt worst than Chazz Palminteri at the end of Usual Suspects. For the first time I saw Lebron for what he really was; a weak, self-centered, spoiled super athlete. And thus I deemed him Lebitch.
The first thing that came to mind after "The Betrayal" was that no one could compare Lebitch to Jordan anymore. Michael was a transcendent athlete that played for a Bulls team that was terrible when he was drafted in '84, but made it his mission to carry Chicago to the promise land and become the best player he could be along the way. Michael loved winning. He wanted to win at everything he did at life. (and in most cases he did) In Lebitch's case, however, no one can really pinpoint what his reason is for playing the game we love. Money? Fame? Highlight on ESPN top 10? No one can say for certain. So instead of pondering a question no one can answer I will answer one that has a definitive answer. Question: Why can't Lebitch be like MJ? Answer: Lebitch will never be MJ because he lacks the drive, competitiveness and focus that Jordan fed off when he played.

The first and smallest difference between Lebitch and Jordan is drive. Now, I am not claiming that LBJ is not a driven player. We have all witnessed his explosions against Deshawn Stevenson, the Hawks, and most recently his decapitation of the Magic while keeping in mind that Orlando's GM, Otis Smith, questioned his competitiveness in the summer. What I am claiming is that his drive comes and goes, and that it seems that he only is driven by outside forces instead of being self-driven. Bill Russell would give himself a grade after every game, the scale being from 1 to 100. The greatest winner in NBA history never gave himself a grade over 50. When Jordan was lacking motivation he would convince himself that someone disrespected him or his game, and torched them for acts they never committed. For example, before a playoff game against the Heat, Jordan walked into the arena and greeted the players he saw as he made his way to the locker room. However, according to Jordan, Alonzo Mourning didn't shake Michael's hand. Jordan was so pissed that he made it his mission to single handedly destroy Alonzo and the Heat. Yet, when Alonzo was asked about the alleged cold shoulder, Mourning said it never happened. He even claimed that he didn't see Jordan until the warm ups began. My problem with Lebitch is that he is only driven when other people can see it, not by nature. Michael did whatever it took to win, even if that meant making up stories to keep himself driven. And lastly, if you think of basketball in the '90s you think of one man, Michael Jordan. He is first and everyone else comes second. This is not the case for Lebitch. He could be the best player in damn near any sport if he chose to but he doesn't, there will always be the debate over who was better Kobe or Lebitch.

The next point and reason I now hate LBJ is his displaced sense of competitiveness. For some odd reason Lebitch cannot comprehend how playing with the third best player (while he is the second best) in the league stains the public's perception of his competitiveness. Some of the best games of the past two or three years have been Wade James duels. Being able to watch two truly great athletes go shot for shot is like watching two great heavy weights go blow for blow. No one can genuinely articulate what your eyes are beholding, you just had to see it to comprehend it. Imagine if Joe Frazier refused to fight Muhammad Ali? Imagine instead that they became training partners and sat at each other's corner during fights are rooted each other on? (Did you throw up yet? Yeah, me too) How could these too super athletes, James and Wade, even want to play with one another? They are suppose to size themselves up against each other. They're suppose to read the papers just to see each others stats so they know what they have to beat out their next game. Lebitch should want to destroy Wade just to show the rest of the world how much better he is, but instead he CHOSE to play with with Wade. In an interview, while promoting the video game NBA 2K11, Jordan said "I would've never called up Larry and Magic and ask them to play with me." Yes Mike, we know you wouldn't. We know Jordan lived for the moments where he could out assists Magic and out shoot Bird, he lived for the moments where he showed the world that he was basketball. LBJ is suppose to follow this example, but instead he take the easy way out. Now just imagine Bird, Magic, and Jordan together in their primes. (Wait... let it all sink in) Would that even be fun to watch? Maybe at first, but after their 5th championship would there even be a need for a regular season or even the playoffs for that matter? Why wouldn't the league just pick a team name out the hat and whoever got picked had the "pleasure" of losing a championship series to Bird, Magic, and Jordan. "And the lucky loser is.... Houston! Get out there fellas, don't lose by too much! " The point of sports is to compete, the reason for professional sports is to have all of our best athletes compete against each other to see who is better and who is the best. The Miami Heat fiasco completely undermines the entire reason for sports, if there are two best players on one team then how can you tell who is better? As a competitor you should want to win, but you should want to beat all of your competition along the way. Michael lived by this, Lebitch ran from it.

Finally and most importantly, the biggest factor that will always separate Jordan from James is focus. No one mentions focus when they speak about Jordan's greatness. I myself got the idea from a book named How to Be Like Mike, by Pat Williams. In the first chapter of the book he tells of an instance in which gave him a new perspective on Michael. While working for the Orlando Magic he asked, former Jordan teammate, B.J. Armstrong to take a look at the beginnings of his book. Armstrong told Pat that he "missed the most important thing." "The thing that makes Micheal who he is", B.J. said, "is his focus." People don't usual tend to see focus as a characteristic of greatness, but when you take some time to ponder the thought, it makes sense. You can credit his prowess on the court to his athleticism or work ethic, but what happened when he was sick or injured? Those last two things are negated, yet somehow Jordan found a way to excel. The most famous of these games was in Game 5 of the 1995 NBA Finals. Michael was terrible ill, reports stating he had "flu like" symptoms (whatever that means). Despite the vague and questionable diagnosis, it was obvious that MJ was not himself. Moving slowly in warm ups and was sweating puddles, everyone knew something was wrong with Michael. However, Jordan was a winner and although his body gave in his was too focused to lose. He finished the game with 38 points, hit the game winning shot, and was carried off the floor by Pip' like a groom carrying his new bride to bed for the first time. However, this is not the only instance of Michael's focus. In 1988, Jordan acquired a cold before the all-star game, but instead of sitting out he scored 42 points and a win. MJ was entirely focused on winning, and nothing would stop him for doing so. James' focus, on the other hand, is else where. As I stated earlier, I can't say in complete confidence that Lebitch is focused on winning. Especially after the 2010 playoffs against the Boston Celtics. As the series' momentum swung toward Boston LBJ gave up, he stop running back on defense and seemed disinterested on the offense. He claimed that whole season that the summer was not distracting him, but it seemed clear that he couldn't wait to get out of a Cavs uniform. The usual amazement I experience when watching James was not there. I never thought "Okay Lebron is about to turn it on now" because I wasn't getting that feeling of anticipation anymore. Can anyone ever say this about Jordan? After "The Decision" happened he stated that he was keeping "metal notes" of critics and made the most pitiful commercial I ever saw. (What should you do Lebitch? Focus on winning instead of critics!) LBJ is that guy in high school who couldn't stand the fact that he might not win prom king, and did everything to get every single vote. Let me fill you in on a secret Lebitch, everyone loves and/or respects champions so why don't you focus on winning one of them?

In final analysis, the reason LBJ lacks the drive, competitiveness, and the focus to be like or greater than Mike is a result of his tragic flaw, his ego. James needs to be loved, needs to be seen as amazing, and can only take praise and never criticism. Instead of taking the challenge of carrying a team to a championship, he took the easy way out and chose to play in Miami with Wade and Bosh. LBJ was suppose to save us from the all the arrogant infuriating superstars of today and he ended up being the greatest ass of them all. He has all the physical talents to be the greatest player we have ever seen, but it is his mental flaws that will always keep him out the same breath as Magic, Bird, and Jordan. We will always remember Lebron James as the coward who could of been our savior.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Flagrant Foul

Hello sports fans, get ready for an in depth look on basketball from today and the past. The first post will be 02/11/11